Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laws against destruction of Federal infrasructure

Posted on 08/13/2012 11:13:22 PM PDT by noodler

There needs to be legislation Voted upon, soon. This is specifically the destruction and poison pills left by any outgoing administration. These are are intended to disrupt the ability of any to respond or place new people in service to protect Our Nation. There is evidence of what is known as 9 11 and more. This will not be as crude as destroying keyboards and cutting cables and the rest. This is going to be something else. This is outright treason if goes to where a new administration cannot function to protect the Country and also for any number of these things are set in place to hamper the current one. There needs to be bi-partisan agreement that this will be investigated and punished. It will then be seen which party would not agree.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; civilwar2; civilwarii; obamunism; whatinsamhillisthis

1 posted on 08/13/2012 11:13:29 PM PDT by noodler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: noodler

Bi partisan efforts to prevent partisan activity that would
hamper an incoming elected group? Surely you jest.

And if not,what are you smoking and why didn’t you bring enough for everyone?


2 posted on 08/13/2012 11:17:17 PM PDT by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noodler

With honorable parties this is possible.

The current administration has demonstrated complete contempt for anything honorable that doesn’t coincide with their agenda.

America needs to man up and deal with this thuggish, marxist, islamist (loving if not actual) regime; to do so it needs to wake up first.

Do we have the nads? Not in the gop-e. It’s up to those of us who want our U.S.A. back - are there enough of us?

It remains to be seen.


3 posted on 08/13/2012 11:31:46 PM PDT by plsjr (<>< ... HIS will be done! (choose a "lesser evil"? NEVER AGAIN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noodler

When the Clintonistas vandalized the White House, Bush had a responsibility to enforce it. But he chose to be be collegial and was more loyal to the cult of the presidency than to the people.

That reaching across the aisle only makes sense if dealing with a loyal opposition, not with a revolutionary disloyal enemy.


4 posted on 08/13/2012 11:48:06 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noodler

Dude, did you previously do editing for Nigerian financial transaction facilitators?


5 posted on 08/14/2012 12:32:56 AM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noodler

In other words - No more Gorelick Walls.


6 posted on 08/14/2012 1:33:52 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noodler

I imagine that the White House is already trashed. We KNOW for example, that venerable paintings have been replaced with cheap snapshots of the Lyin’ King, and that the bust of Churchill was removed.

Next thing you know, all the “R’s” will be missing from all the typewriters and computer keyboards.


7 posted on 08/14/2012 9:54:58 AM PDT by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson