Reagan actually legalised abortion back in California in 1969, with his signature, do I hate him, no.
He may have started a bad precedent, which the Supreme Court verified with the outrageous Roe V. Wade verdict, but Reagan later on was a very pro-life advocate.
Reagan was pro-life when he signed that bill for the health of the mother in 1967, although we didn’t have language like pro-life, and pro-choice yet and most of us weren’t sure what it was all about, back then we were told that it was merely, a “unviable tissue mass”.
Reagan was sucker punched, and it tormented him, Mitt Romney was already for abortion at the time, and remained so, this week he said he wants abortion for the “health” of the mother.
Your beloved Romney said Reagan signing a law that made provision for the health of the mother makes him pro-choice. But now Romney comes out and says his abortion position is now exactly the same. But he claims that makes him pro-life. What gives?
Which lie is he telling now? Reagan had no idea the dems would twist the health of the mother to mean abortions for morning sickness and any other thing imaginable. He also regretted what had happened with all his heart.
With the benefit of 40+ years of experience, Romney, on the other hand, knew full well that the health of the mother is the dems trick to get all abortion covered and now believes he should be considered pro-life. Even though he never shed one tear or expressed any regret for the laws, and the appointees he is responsible for that lead to the murder of children. To this very day, he sings the praises of his fifty dollar or free abortion Romneycare and contrary to some of his prior statements, his own sister says he is still pro-choice.
Reagan went from caring enough about the mothers to fall for the democrats ruse to standing up for the children. Romney went from caring nothing about the babies to caring only about getting elected. Big change there, eh.
He may have started a bad precedent, which the Supreme Court verified with the outrageous Roe V. Wade verdict, but Reagan later on was a very pro-life advocate.
Yes, I know Reagan was pro-abortion, but he unlike romney, Reagan became pro-life stayed completely pro-life and PASSIONATELY spoke out for the babies and against those who thought it was ok to murder a baby. That was my point. Reagan never flipped like romney does. Romney talks about being pro-life, which he is not and that is why he he has no passion on the issue. Abortion is just a political box he needs to check off and hope voters don't look to close to see he's just playing politics with babies lives. With romney liberals will get to kill innocent babies because their father was a criminal, as well as the life and health (health is bogus) and gay adoption. Pro-lifers hear he is 100% pro-life (which is a joke) and for family values-his idea of family values. He apparently want gays to enjoy his value of families.