Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

18” waist! Size one slippers! Man, that woman was tiny.


3 posted on 09/03/2012 6:13:20 AM PDT by randita (Paul Ryan is "Mr. Smith goes to Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: randita

My six-year-old son has bigger feet than that.


5 posted on 09/03/2012 6:28:58 AM PDT by Tax-chick (A meal without wine is like ... breakfast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: randita
18” waist! Size one slippers! Man, that woman was tiny.

My baby daughter (youngest of four) was married in March. Her dress was this size. Different style, of course.

Interesting factoid -- in the current fashion of strapless gowns, my daughter had to search all over the country to find a dress in her tiny size that did NOT have bare shoulders. Eventually she found one and we bought it over the phone.

Later, she discovered that Prince William's Kate had wrenched the wedding dress fashion industry back toward sleeved, shoulder-covered styles. And why did she go that route?

Westminster Abbey will not permit brides to wear sleeveless, strapless gowns during wedding ceremonies. Old fashioned notions of modesty and all that, dontcha know.

8 posted on 09/03/2012 6:45:52 AM PDT by Brandybux (Oportet ministros manus lavare antequam latrinam relinquent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: randita
18” waist! Size one slippers! Man, that woman was tiny.

People in general were smaller then. The Allies winning WWII did wonders for diet and nutrition world-wide.

27 posted on 09/03/2012 5:42:57 PM PDT by Poison Pill (Take your silver lining and SHOVE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson