[JustSayNoToNannies]

She said that there was a warrant for the residence of the alleged drug dealing tenant/daughter’s boyfriend, that she also owned. She NEVER said that the warrant did not cover her personal residence as well.

Nor did she say it did. No evidence there for your claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence."

The reporter clearly stated that it did cover both houses.

Stated with no corroborating evidence on display. No evidence there for your claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence."

[Above My Pay Grade]

Are you really that obtuse?

The woman never claimed there was no warrant for her house. The reporter (who had the search warrant in front of him) claimed that the warrant listed both houses and nobody has disputed this (except you).

You made an incorrect assumption (though a reasonable one, at the time, based upon the misleading headline) and just can’t let go of it, no matter what the facts show. Are you sure you aren’t a Democrat?