Thank you for confirming that you would rather government employees ignore constitutional protections simply because you disapprove of the behavior of the accused.
“Probable cause” is not sufficient, constitutionally, to search that woman’s residence.
The woman’s name was NOT on the warrant. Lance Thompson’s name WAS on the warrant. “Probable cause” does not mean “we get to invade homes of anyone we THINK or BELIEVE might be connected to Lance Thompson”
The *only* residence they could legally search was Lance Thompson’s residence.
“Thank you for confirming that you would rather government employees ignore constitutional protections simply because you disapprove of the behavior of the accused.”
Well, I’d say you are welcome, but it ain’t what I said. At all. You’re so convinced that you’re right you aren’t hearing, reading or even SEEING the things I pointed out. See you around.