“The address on the warrant was for the boyfriend’s residence.”
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence.
Only one address, not both, is shown on the warrant.
A *claim* that both addresses were on the warrant is made by the reporter (this claim is not corroborated by showing both addresses), just before the same reporter launches into the police’s defense.
I remind you that the same people who broke into her house are also the same people pretending that a dog in a closed bedroom *needed* to be shot because it was vicious.