Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tomkat
I think the question is this: At what point is the threshold reached at which the rage engendered by these barbaric koranimals, battering at the ramparts of civilization, overcomes the legal risks of vigilantism ?

____________________________________

When their attacks are battering the ramparts within this country, our reply will not be vigilantism, but patriotism.

I am no vigilante. But I will not stand down to a direct attack.

87 posted on 09/14/2012 6:32:47 PM PDT by KittenClaws (You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: KittenClaws
When their attacks are battering the ramparts within this country

When PC stupidity or blatant self-interest effectively deprives citizens of the protection they've already paid for;
when the Constitution is being shredded and the lives and property and ideals of those millions who've worked to uphold it all these years are being callously put at risk;
then there may very well come a point at which 'vigilantism' and patriotism will become synonymous.

We're not talking Charley Bronson movies here, or hysterical lib mouth-foaming misappropriation of the language, but an historically defined term.
I have in mind groups of otherwise law-abiding citizens organizing to protect themselves in the face of the indifference and/or incompetence of established authority/s.
Because when push comes to jihad, the only difference between self-defense and 'vigilantism' is a semantic variable dependent on the address of your particular gulag.

/.02

- - - - - -

Definition of vigilante

noun


92 posted on 09/14/2012 7:10:51 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson