IMHO, it can be a mistake to overgeneralize in making an analogy between Nazism/Hitler and Obama.
One must understand a few very important points that in certain ways actually flip the sides of the coin of WWII.
1) Hitler and the Nazi party were virulent anti-communists. Now it is true that they were statists, but one must understand that historically, for thousands of years, government has always been considered a top-down hierarchical structure, and that northern European culture, along with other cultures, very much subscribe to a principle of society being organized in a top-down, paternal organizational structure. Communists literally advertise a government "of the proletariat" - a government "of the working class", which is utter nonsense and a sheer lie, since leadership is by definition hierarchical. At the end of the day, logically, in a town of 1,000 people, there simply can not be 1,000 leaders and no followers, since from time to time decisions must be made and the town can't go in 1,000 different directions. In truth, this government of the proletariat is nothing more than an oligarchy, a government of a small ruling group, which in communism's case, of course, is the party leadership. Reality bears this out, as we can see Communist parties and unions around the world where the same party leadership stays in power until they retire or die. In America today, not only Obama, but the whole Democrat party insider leadership in each State and at the national level is riddled with people who, in truth, subscribe to communist principles, though they paint themselves publicly as populists using terms like the misappropriated term liberal.
2) The communist movement worldwide is, at it's heart, an international one. The movers and shakers of communism are a class of people that are, in their loyalties, "without country", even though they are citizens of this or that nation. This is because communist theory is one of eventual world domination. As the U.S. is the only worthy adversary of either Russia or China, the main "politiburo-controlled" nations who continue to be run by people who think along communist lines, the international communist intelligentsia understand that their simplest route to success is to subvert America from within by exploiting the Constitution's terse definitions by judicial reinterpretation, so as to extend our basic freedoms to include a right to subversive actions. Hitler, on the other hand, was very much a nationalist, desiring the ascendance of Germany as a world power, and the German people as the leaders of the world. Obama, however, has been tasked with exactly the opposite goal, to bring America to it's destruction.
3) Certainly the extermination of Jews was an abomination, however, while perversions and immorality existed within Nazi party membership, the stated Nazi position was against them. The Nazi party officially did not sanction homosexuality, drug abuse, etc. U.S. Democrats, on the other hand, like their communist brethren, see all the various groups promoting immorality as a key constituency, and their stated party platform is fully accepting of these immoralities. This is because they see them as a) an easy way to gain votes in the short term and b) an extremely useful tool in destroying American society from the inside in the medium term. Atheists who think of themselves as conservatives may even agree with these statements, however, they miss the key point of Biblical doctrine, that men are born into sin. Christians are often portrayed as being "holier than thou" and "hypocrites", but this is only believable to those who do not know Biblical doctrine. Accordingly, without the power of the Holy Spirt, man is powerless to resist sin; but I digress. Once again, we see a clear difference between Democrats and Nazis; the latter's policies were directed towards an attempt - albeit delusional - to benefit it's nation, while the former's policies officially sanction the corruption of it's citizens and it's demise as a military power. Another bunch of useful idiots for communists are muslims; the "new world order" proponents obviously plan to use them to assist in America's downfall, and then to allow them to run roughshod over Christians to effectively elminate their political influence, after which the thought is that muslims will all fall in line under their "new world order" masters. Clearly, the goal is to sink America and all her citizens into a nightmarish slavery run by a politiburo literally chock-full of it's own version of little Stalins.
In general, we should recognize that Obama is not the mastermind behind communism, only it's errand boy. He is not an evil genius, he was simply an available and willing servant who is following this portion of the Alinsky playbook. He is not seeking to take ultimate power himself, but to enable his masters to carry out their delusional "new world order" plans. Though the global elitists decry the delusional grand plans of Hitler, they themselves think that they can create a perfect world if only everyone would follow their own grand plan, an exercise which portends tragic folly on yet an even grander scale than Nazi Germany and WWII-era Japan, if that can be imagined..
The following is a link to an interesting document for those concerned with national sovereignty that was published by the UN over ten years ago.
www.un.org/esa/ffd/a55-1000.pdf
Hitler was tragically mistaken in his assessment that Jewish bankers in particular were the bane of his grand plan, as what he found so frustrating was simply the nature of large international financial concerns to bear more allegiance to their investors and assets than to the governments or citizens of any particular nation. Such allegiances, of course, are present no matter the ethnic or religious makeup of the international financial concern. An effective national government simply enforces reasonable checks on international financiers, and resists the tempation to become indebted to them thereby protecting it's citizens from becoming collateral damage as a result of government spending and debt. His singling out of Jews was no doubt partly due to age-old anti-Semitism on his part and his realization that anti-Semitism could stirred up amongst a fair amount of the populace and thereby used as a political tool, but probably mostly due to his need to run a command economy in order to support his military ambitions that were steps towards his goal of Germany controlling more territory. Making Jews a public scapegoat provided Hitler with tactical benefit in running a domestic rule by terror, but more importantly removed any public political opposition to his government's confiscation of business and banking operations and assets. This left all financial assets and operations available to the state to be employed as war resources. Caught up in the emotion of the horror of the holocaust, people often can do no serious analysis of it's realities and it's continuing relevance today, as the current cycle of anti-Semitism which the Nazis set in motion in Europe - and then purposely fanned the flames of in the middle east to strain British warmaking resources- continues to wax to greater horrific fullness. We must remember that the koran instructs muslims to subjugate or kill non-muslims, and that muslims who do not do this are simply half-hearted muslims, not peaceful ones. Also, these koranic instructions have created societies where muslims who are not participating in terror and murder will sit by and watch it with the mindset that the offenders are being good muslim warriors; these are the purported "peaceful" muslims that we hear so much talk of. These same peaceful muslims will donate billions of dollars to front organizations posing as charities that funnel off funds to support the building of the worldwide caliphate.
Obama, unlike Hitler, has no need to single out Jews, since the majority of them are loyal Democrats, being largely influenced by having so many roots in Eastern Europe, the real birthplace of leftism. Leftism has, as one of it's key tenets, atheism. Since secularism dominates modern American Judaism, an obvious fact given the athiest platform of the Democratic party, leftists see no politically significant religious-based opposition from the Jewish community. There is, however, enough political momentum amongst Christians to pose a political block to communism, due to communism's core atheism. Thus we see a concerted leftist effort to blot out Christianity using any and all tactics at their disposal. As the American citizen's plight continues to worsen, hopefully believing Christians can shine light on the nefarious plans of leftism, and demonstrate that leftism is an example of how human pride and arrogance result in God's chastisement and can even result in his wrath.
Faith in the God of the Bible is the last blockage standing in the way of American subversion and surrender to the modern day tower of Babel that is the leftism of intellectual elitists; like so often recounted in the Bible, the route back to national security and prosperity begins with national Covenanting with God.
If history is repeating itself, how will Obama transition from President to Dictator? Certainly the military will need to be his willing accomplice. ----------------------------------------------------- Obama needs an SS... The Schutzstaffel (German pronunciation: [ˈʃʊtsʃtafəl] ( listen), translated to Protection Squadron or defence corps, abbreviated SS—or with stylized "Armanen" sig runes) was a major paramilitary organization under Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party (NSDAP). Built upon the Nazi ideology, the SS under Heinrich Himmler's command was responsible for many of the crimes against humanity during World War II (1939–1945). After 1945, the SS was banned in Germany, along with the Nazi Party, as a criminal organization. The SS began as a small permanent guard unit made up of NSDAP volunteers to provide security for Nazi Party meetings in Munich. Formed at the end of 1920, they were known as the "Saal-Schutz" (Hall-Protection).[1] Later under the leadership of Heinrich Himmler between 1929 and 1945, the SS was renamed the "Schutz-Staffel" and grew from a small paramilitary formation to one of the largest and most powerful organizations in the Third Reich.[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel