Well of course it isn’t jmacusa so I guess I was right the first time. Your reading comprehension sucks. Here is what jmacusa actually wrote:
“Southern plutocrats launched a war they deliberately provoked after seceding from the Union and a war meant to maintain their slave economy.”
He didn’t say that they attacked Sumter to help their slave economy you dolt. The initiated insurrection and a war against their own country in order to perpetuate their slave-based economy.
“Southern plutocrats launched a war they deliberately provoked after seceding from the Union and a war meant to maintain their slave economy.”
And how was launching a war supposed to help their slave economy? Do you not understand how much like an IDIOT you sound by suggesting that launching a war was beneficial to their "slave economy"? The fact that you have now repeated the same idiot-stupid point is just further evidence that you are not worth discussing this with.
It is pointless to argue with someone who keeps repeating that launching a war in which they were seriously mauled was somehow helpful to maintaining their "slave economy." It wasn't. It wiped out their "slave economy."
He didn’t say that they attacked Sumter to help their slave economy you dolt. The initiated insurrection and a war against their own country in order to perpetuate their slave-based economy.
Do you have a job? Do you work for a living? I can't imagine anyone with your inability to comprehend the meaning of sentences can be a productive member of society. You aren't the stupidest person I have ever argued with, but i'm thinking you are in the top ten. Let me spell it out for you simpleton. Attacking Fort Sumter was what "initiated" of "launched" the war which You somehow think was done because it was beneficial to their "slave economy."
I think you, and your friends that are saying this nonsense are so obsessed with your own certainty, that you will put forth obvious absurdities so long as you can maintain your belief that they were in the wrong, and your "team" was in the right. You aren't an objective Historian, you are a cheerleader for a narrative.