Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible Suicide Mission Mosin Nagant! Coated In "Orange Cyanide" Very Rare!
gunbroker.com ^ | 9-22-12 | Gun Broker

Posted on 09/27/2012 3:01:36 PM PDT by dynachrome

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: SampleMan

30-06 is a long case .30 caliber as compared to the M1 carbine or the .308 which is short action. 7.62 x 54R is a long case is also .30 caliber. While obviously not the same there are enough similarities. When educating others, it is best to start with something that they know (30-06) and make a comparison.

Thus to frame the conversation to someone who knows the American / British weapons, letting someone know that it is the Russian version of the 30-06 is a valid description. No one ever said that the 30-06 predated the 7.62 x 54R.


41 posted on 09/27/2012 6:09:10 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Most MN are not too heavy for men, can be heavy for women. Yes you can do a lot to trick out the MN. There is even an outfit that sells a bullpup replacement stock.


42 posted on 09/27/2012 6:27:24 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
I guess it takes us back to the “tastes like chicken” issue.

The 7.62x54R is similar to the .30-06, but perhaps not any more so than to any other .30-.32 cartridge of the day.

30-06 = 150 @2,700, or 172 @ 2,640.
7.9x57 Mauser = 154 @ 2,835.
7.62x54R = 147 @ 2,886
.303 British = 175 @ 2,440.
7.7x58 Ariska = 175 @ 2,400.

I get your purpose and point taken, its just a pet peeve of mine to see MNs listed on Gunbroker as “The Russian .30-06”. They probably just mean “similar too” as well, so perhaps I should stop being such a purist and get over myself on the issue.

43 posted on 09/27/2012 6:45:38 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The Finn stocked 1891s are very beefy and heavy guns. Even the Finn 91/38 is much heavier than the Russian 91/30s. The Finns were probably much beefier too though.


44 posted on 09/27/2012 6:52:06 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
They probably just mean “similar too” as well, so perhaps I should stop being such a purist and get over myself on the issue.

Well, like the 7.62 x 54R, the 30.06 shoots a 7.62 round. The 30.06 shoots essentially the same weight bullet at essentially the same velocity as the 7.62 x 54R. It does so from a case about 54 mm in length. But it is not a rimmed case. So you find it sloppy to call it the "Russian 30.06"?

45 posted on 09/27/2012 7:10:33 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

oing


46 posted on 09/28/2012 12:31:07 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
So you find it sloppy to call it the "Russian 30.06"?

Well I do yes. Probably because I take a historical connotation in the description, and the historical link is not there. As I pointed out earlier, one can compare the ballistics of almost all .30-.32 cal medium to long case cartridges and declare them "the same" if a difference of a few hundred fps doesn't bug you. To say they are similar can be useful as a frame of reference. Getting back to the Russians, the Soviets flat out copied many things, like the B-29. Thus, that is what I'm thinking when I hear "Russian .30-06". To a neophyte, I might describe it as a .30 cal rimmed case, with a length between that of an -06 and a .308. But that's just me. Depending on their level of knowledge, I might also say its a shiny thing that goes bang. :-)

47 posted on 09/28/2012 3:46:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
This is probably the best explanation of why the .30-06 isn't the first thing that pops into my mind when I think 7.62x54R comparisons:
But if a person only knows U.S. hunting cartridges, then using the .308 (closer in size) and .30-06 as references would be a logical comparison for them, for size and performance.



48 posted on 09/28/2012 6:09:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
OK For me, when I hear .06 or 300 mag or .223 I think in terms of performance more so than lineage.
49 posted on 09/28/2012 7:54:59 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson