Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky9teen

I feel like number two today.


2 posted on 09/28/2012 6:06:24 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Law As It Should Be

Two men were walking down the street one evening when they observed a well dressed, attractive young woman ahead of them. One of them remarked to the other “I’d give $500 to spend the night with that woman.” To their surprise, the woman had heard the remark and, turning around, said, “I’ll take you up on that.” So, after bidding his friend good night, the man accompanied the woman to her apartment where they immediately went to bed.

The next morning, as he prepared to leave, the man presented her with a $50 bill. The woman demanded the rest of the money stating, “If you don’t give me the full $500 I’ll sue you for it.” He laughed saying, “I’d like to see you get it since prostitution is illegal.”

A couple days later he was surprised when served with a complaint and summons ordering him to appear in court. He hurried to his lawyer’s office and explained the details to him. His lawyer said, “She can’t possibly get a judgment against you on such grounds, but it will be interesting to see how the case is presented.”

On the appointed day and after the usual preliminaries, the woman’s lawyer addressed the court: “Your honor, my client is the owner of a piece of property , a garden spot surrounded by a profuse growth of shrubbery, which property she agreed to rent to the Defendant for specific purposes and for a specific length of time, for the sum of $500. The Defendant took possession of the property, used it extensively for the purpose for which it was rented, but upon vacating the premises paid only $50 of the agreed upon rental amount. The rental amount for this property was not excessive, and we ask the Court to enter judgment against the Defendant to assure payment of the balance.”

The man’s lawyer was amused at the way the case was presented. He therefore altered his planned defense and proceeded as follows: “Your honor, the Defendant agrees that the Plaintiff has a fine piece of property, that he did rent the property for the purpose and time. However, upon occupying the property, the Defendant found an open well around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft, erected a pump, all labor being performed by himself. These improvements to the property are sufficient to effect the unpaid balance and the Plaintiff was, as a result, adequately and fully compensated for the rental. The Defendant therefore moves the Court to deny judgment for the Plaintiff.”

The woman’s lawyer rose for rebuttal: “Your honor, Plaintiff agrees that the Defendant did find a well on the property, and that he did make the improvements as counsel stated. However, it was because he knew of the well that Defendant rented the property. Furthermore, upon vacating the premises, the Defendant removed the stones, pulled up the shaft and took the pump with him. In so doing, he not only dragged the equipment through the shrubbery, but he left the well hole larger than it was before his occupancy and left it easily accessible for little children. Plaintiff asks the Court for judgment in her favor.

AND SHE GOT IT!


30 posted on 09/28/2012 6:34:59 AM PDT by sockhead (Socialism: trickle up poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

57 posted on 09/28/2012 8:10:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson