“My theme has been that of keeping potentially adverse information out of the hands of those prosecuting the case. “
Fairytales and superstitions have no place in reality. Until you’ve actually been in a shoot and the process that follows you have no idea what you are talking about. I am sick and tired of hearing every inexperienced idiot opine about if and buts without any common sense of reality. People saying handloads are dangerous before a court without there having been a single instance of such a thing even after thousands and thousands of cases before the courts only hurts the reloading industry. It is as bad as any liberal talking about guns.
“If ‘if’ and ‘buts’ were candy and nuts we’d all have a merry Christmas!”
... as is hearing from someone who just absolutely refuses to even contemplate that someone else’s position may have even a scintilla of merit.
Haven’t been in a shoot, and hope to hell I won’t be. In the meantime, learning from numerous sources - particularly recognized experts in the field - and then sorting out and using what makes sense seems prudent.
Where’s your evidence that “there’s never been a single instance”? Have you personally scrubbed through transcripts of every single case out there? Can you guarantee there never will be such an instance?
You’re free to accept (or not) anyone else’s comments. Your perspective is a lot less tolerable wrapped in the $hit sandwich.
Do as you please - no one’s forcing you to do anything.
I’m done with you.