IS OBVIOUS TROLL VERY OBVIOUS?

vanity

[Leep]

The Answer to toll poster: Obviously.

[ScaniaBoy]

Yes, Congress did not do well, and therefore the majority was reversed in 2006. However, given the rise of the Tea Party and their (sic!) win in 2010, the sitting GOP members should be aware that much can happen in the primaries.

No, I don’t think R/R will tell Congres to leagalize gay marriage, and I don’t think any except a slim minority of the republicans in the Congress would vote for such a law.

[muawiyah]

We need to focus on taking over the party and removing the RINOs. There will be a number of the worst ones accepting appointments in the Romney regime, and that’s the time to strike.

[Responsibility2nd]

Heh. I wuz IBTZ and didn’t know it.

[GladesGuru]

“There is only one Manchurian candidate in this race - the other guy.”

That should be:
“There is only one Mansourian candidate in this race - the other guy.”

Barak Hussein was paid for and placed into Harvard by a turncoat lawyer once known as Don Warden. He defected to Islam and the Saudi Royal family and became Al-mansour, and the Muslim bag man for the Saudi Royal family.

Hence “Mansourian”.

[DannyTN]

I understand his speeches when running for governor of Mass were very conservative too. But his actions weren't. It should be a huge warning that his campaign manager talked openly of Etch-a-sketching positions. That said, is he worse than Obama? Very hard to say. But I can think of five ways that he might be.

• Homosexual Marriage. He implemented gay marriage in Mass when he had no law authorizing him to do so. By doing so he As did more damage to the nation than Obama has done as President. As Governor he appointed homosexual activists to the bench. He promised that he would be better for gays than Ted Kennedy and there is no doubt he was. And even campaigning for President he told the Boy Scouts they should allow gays in leadership positions.
• Economy: Trade. Romney is a proponent of free trade. That's the biggest structural problem with our economy, that we have opened our market to competition by third world countries and communist countries like China that have $2/day labor. We get cheap goods but 25% of our people our out of work and the knowledge and equipment transfer to our enemies has been tremendous. Romney would prescribe for the economy more of free trade which would make our unemployment even worse.
• Economy: Government Spending Romney wants to cut government spending. But without first fixing the structural issues in the economy, cutting government spending will do even more damage to the economy. More people out of work, more business failures, more crime. Cutting spending is an admirable goal, but the economy needs to be running good first. Cutting spending and safety nets in the middle of high unemployment is going to result in a backlash aimed squarely at Republicans and conservatism. Getting people back to work would result in >$2 trillion/year in new taxes and reduced government outlays. That's the right way to balance the budget.
• If Romney wins, the Republicans will renominate him in 2016. Which means it will be 2020 before we can get a good candidate in place. If Romney loses we will have a different candidate in 2016.
• If Romney has a successful presidency the Mormons will claim their White Horse prophecy was fulfilled and it may lead more people into the Mormon darkness.
• There is an artcle on WND about Mormons efforts and plans to take over the government. Mormon bishop's daughter spills Romney's 'secrets' ..."

[muawiyah]

Due to a 9% response rate on almost all the polls, none of them are of any statistical utility.

[Thickman]

You are either a troll or one of those “conservatives” who is no better than the libtards who vote and then expect “Daddy Government” to take care of everything while they live-out their pop culture lives. Real citizens vigilantly hold their leaders’ feet to the fire.

[rbbeachkid]

You go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had.

[muawiyah]

or, in reality, a second month. We really cannot afford any more of these leftwingtard notions and nostrums ~ they were invented in the late 1800s and early 1900s and they've all failed too many times to count.

No future president should be given the slightest reason to believe that he can implement any more of this nonsense ~ nip it in the bud!

[Crawdad]

Here’s my thoughts: You’re new, and you’re an asshole.

[nickcarraway]

The Tea Party was a total flop in the primary. Then the Supreme Court decision approve Obama/Romneycare took the wind out of it’s sales. Now the Tea Party totally sold out to Romney. They are no resistance to him anymore. Basically, it’s, “any socialist but Obama,” now.

[italianquaker]

“I have 5 sons and just because you keep repeating something doesnt make it true”

[mass55th]

"or, in reality, a second month. "

If anyone really loves this country, they won't sit home on election day, and give Obama the ability to gut our military even more, continue to turn his back on Israel, bow even more to Russia and muslim nations, and pursue his goal of bringing this country to its knees. He's already got a head-start. Do we want to let him finish the job?

Really folks, do we want to have to put up with Moochelle's fashion stupidity for the next four years, or give her free reign to travel non-stop around the world at our expense, because you know that's what would happen. Just that alone should force any sensible Republican to vote for Romney on November 6th.

[no-to-illegals]

Am going to post something I typed (at least it will be similar to what I typed/posted) back about six months plus ago. Am still wondering if there is the will in D.C. to avoid the fiscal cliff which is rapidly approaching? If no will in D.C., what difference will it make, except in the possibility of who is nominated as SC justices? Am a Conservative and a small r, and while I will agree there is not a Conservative running, there is only the choice as it is. Dang ... and I actually mean a stronger word than will type. This election has left me hanging up the phone on more than one or two people, and wondering and having to backtrack on some of the other calls. It has become dangerous, when looking at the reality to be for either candidate. Dang!

The candidates are not the only sign of trouble to come. The economy is another sign, there is trouble ahead. Another sign is simply to look across the pond. Dang, Dang, Dang. That's three Dangs. Dang, Dang, Dang. Maybe the dangs should have been bangs? Somebody put on Spooky!

[Focault's Pendulum]

Here’s my thoughts: You’re new, and you’re an asshole.

And banned.

[mass55th]

"Congress will do anything Romney tells them..."

Why worry about what ifs? Let's focus on what we do know as FACT, that Obama has turned his back on our allies, is gutting our military, getting Americans, both civilian and military killed, destroying our economy and freedoms, coddling muzzies, running a crime syndicate from the White Hut, plus much, much more. Sorry, but I'd rather vote against another four years of what I know is coming under Obama while I still have the right to do it.

[a fool in paradise]

kill big bird-- yeah I like that

Those who bitch about taxpayer support for Nationalist Socialist Public Broadcasting being cut are hypocrites if they don't donate their OWN money to PBSNPR EVERY time there is a fundraising appeal.

[no-to-illegals]

Don’t you have a birthday in two days?

[ScaniaBoy]

The Tea Party was a total flop in the primary.

Really?

Then the Supreme Court decision approve Obama/Romneycare took the wind out of it’s sales.

But this may put the wind back in it's sails. The Supreme Court shocks life into Obamacare challenge

So, please, cheer up, The glass is at least half-full. :-)