It’s more than your pro-dope agenda that sets libertarians apart from the crowd as weird Ron Paul-Occupier types.
I use the pro-dope agenda you guys have because it’s a passion of yours. You people are obsessed by it.
But be that as it may, there are still a great deal of other reasons to smirk at you liberals. Look at your (lack of) leader/heroes. Look at the damage you’ve done to the TEA Party. Look at how the Ron Paul/Mitt Romeny alliance drove away real conservatives like Cain, Newt, Bachmann, Palin and Perry earlier this year.
And the whole theme of this thread whining about why there were no libertarian questions at last night’s debate? Priceless!
Face it. You losertarians are inconsequential in American politics.
Nope. My main obsession these days is the growing police State and the Jupiter sized debt load our various levels of government are raking up.
Once again, "it's the freedom, stupid."
Damage to the TEA Party? How so? We're (those of us who do more than just give lip service to the various TEA Party groups) fielding more TEA Party backed candidates this election cycle than ever before. And winning... It was RINO insiders that torpedoed far superior candidates like Cain and Bachmann. Had less to do with Paul-bots and more to do with it being "Willard's turn".
You losertarians are inconsequential in American politics.
You just keep telling yourself that little RINO... You sure expend a lot of energy trying to convince everyone else. Heck, I'm not even a "L"ibertarian. They even, finally, stopped sending me junk mail. ;-)