[RegulatorCountry]

There’s no “I think” regarding an admission that the understanding upon which the court purports to rely does not exist in cited precedent. It’s there for anyone to read and understand.

Gloat all you want, you’ll have to live under the foreign despot to which this will surely lead, yourself. Rain falls upon the just and unjust alike.

[BigGuy22]

'There’s no “I think” regarding an admission...'
__

Now you're going off the deep end with a delusional claim that your opinions are facts, and that you don't just "think" -- you know.

Lots of luck with that approach. It sounds like loony-bin material to me.