“You have also said repeatedly that he’s responsible for endangering his dogs by running a pot growing operation.”
No, I have asserted that anyone who deliberately puts their dogs in harm’s way bears some responsibility if they come to harm.
I do not feel sorry, for example, for a man who has his dog hit by a car if he lets him play in the street. Even if he alleges that some meanie sped up and hit him on purpose. Maybe the meanie did, maybe he didn’t. But you shouldn’t let your dog play in the street.
When asked how you determined that, you replied, at post #52:
He kept dogs at his pot growing operation.
What, in your mind, makes it OK to say that, then claim you never did?