[SeekAndFind]

Soft tissue in a supposedly 70-million-year-old bone? How did that survive?

These are not just stretchy ligaments with identifiable proteins, but flexible transparent branching blood vessels, containing an ooze that could be squeezed out like toothpaste. And inside these vessels were the easily identifiable remains of red blood cells, even showing the nuclei, typical of reptiles .

[count-your-change]

So long as the 65 to 70 million year is held sacrosanct the scientists will accept a turkey-like T.rex leaving behind blood samples.

Anything other than questioning their time line.

[svcw]

Really interesting, thanks for posting.

[count-your-change]

So long as the 65 to 70 million year is held sacrosanct the scientists will accept a turkey-like T.rex leaving behind blood samples.

Anything other than questioning their time line.

[svcw]

Do you have a ping list for these great nature/science articles you find?
If you do, please add me.

[Just another Joe]

Now, does this mean that timelines for dinosaurs are incorrect, or does it mean the dinosuars existed well past the timeline that was given?

In other words, is it a cosmic joke played by an amused God (God made it all in a past much closer than mankind thinks, with things mankind can look at and speculate that things are much older), or did diosuars exist 60,000,000 years ago AND live well into the age when mankind also roamed the earth.

OR, is it something no one has thought of yet?

[mountainlion]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXbQTfedDpU&feature=related

[houeto]

Brachylophosaurus

[Oldpuppymax]

VERY neat stuff. I wonder how many other soft tissue remains have been missed by people who KNEW they could not be found?

[Altariel]

“Soft tissue in a supposedly 70-million-year-old bone? How did that survive? “

Easy. So John Hammond could discover it, extract it, and create a dinosaur zoo.