Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen
(lol (sorry for the laughing) (like they'd care about that))

Laugh all you want. If you intend to kidnap someone you would care whether they were killed or not.

This is why I think the fingerprints of Hillary are there:

No argument there.

54 posted on 10/24/2012 1:05:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

No, not laughing at that, I didn’t mean Stevens, but the protection force. The muzz would see them as collateral and would have no desire to avoid killing them. In fact, that was part of the battle plan, kill as many protectors / others as possible.

In Bret Bair’s report, he said the first thing they did was come up to the Libyan guards at the gate and ask where Stevens was and they told them in the main residence.

Then it was all clear to attack the other buildings to keep them pinned down - which was exactly what was done.

It sounded like an inside job. The attackers did not have equipment to get through the safe haven door, they simply tried to smoke Stevens out. If someone sets a house on fire - everybody comes out.

I thought about this: not telling Stevens anything ensured that he would never give up the ruse. If he had been taken hostage and then “rescued”, he would always believe that it was real.


55 posted on 10/24/2012 1:25:30 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson