Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican; MNJohnnie; MplsSteve; LS; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued; Perdogg; ...
I'm gonna go out on a limp here and predict we actually have a better chance of taking MN than OR, despite the polls. I can't see Oregon going to Romney unless it was some 47+ states landslide where Obama was getting killed nationally. The problem with Oregon is that the state is fairly Republican outside of the coastal area, but the coastal area is freaking marxist like its neighbors and fellow west coast states, Washington and California. Portland routinely outvotes the rest of the state.

Minnesota has plenty of liberal nuts scattered in various parts of the state, but has a better track record than Oregon when it comes to actually electing some decent Governors and U.S. Senators in the last dozen years or so. (I can't think of the last time Oregon had a decent one). I think Reagan would have won Minnesota if he had campaigned there in 1984, but choose not to, out of respect for not embarrassing Mondale. We haven't won either of them in any recent Presidential election, but we've come far closer to taking Minnesota on several occasions. In Oregon, Obama beat McCain by over 16 points in 2008. In Minnesota, Obama still won comfortably but the margin of victory was in single digits.

It really depends on what kind of numbers are happening nationally, but I expect Obama will run at least 3-4% better in Oregon than he's doing in Minnesota. We'll see.

26 posted on 10/28/2012 12:04:56 AM PDT by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy

President Reagan did campaign in MN the day before the election . . . .

OR wouldn’t be Romney’s 47th state; it would be like the 36th or 37th.


28 posted on 10/28/2012 8:14:12 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

Decent governors??

When?

Ventura? Ummmmm no.
Dayton? Ummmmm no.
Tpaw.. well.. I’ll give you that one. However, he was not all that great.


29 posted on 10/28/2012 8:28:36 AM PDT by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; Perdogg; randita

I regret that Reagan didn’t go all out in MN!!! We’d have to wait till 2002 for that SOB Mondale to have the honor of being the first and only man to lose an election in all 50 states!!!! And we may never see a 50 state sweep now as long as Vermont remains in the union.

As for which state goes first. I agree MN, it is trending Republican and has been slightly more Republican, barley in 2004 but McCain did a few points better in 2008. Oregon was slightly ahead back in 2000.

Maybe because McCain only got 40% in Oregon but it has not been talked about at all while Minnesota has, (as has NJ which I’d rank behind both). All 3 are about in the same tier.

Rats have a knack for theft in Oregon, and recently in MN as well as the duly elected Governor and duly reelected Senator can tell you.


32 posted on 10/29/2012 6:31:33 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson