[Cletus.D.Yokel]

And, to you, Happerset v Minor is just “legal hokum”?

[Hugin]

It's not a precedent. It merely mentions that there is a legal theory about a difference between what constitutes a "natural born citizen" as opposed to "native born" citicens, then states that they don't need to rule on the theory's validity, since it's irrelevent to the issue at hand. Noting that a legal theory exists does not make it precedent.