Thanks for the definition, saves me from googling :^)
Could be, but explain Obama’s first debate performance......
When you start looking through the glasses of conspiracy, many of the apparantly unrelated odd events start to make sense.
I don’t think the US generals had gotten to the point of “coup” yet, and I don’t think they ever would or had even thought of it. However, the fact that several of them were obviously concerned enough about what was going on at Benghazi to “criticize” him indirectly by wanting to rescue our forces was probably enough in his mind to brand them as disloyal - to him, since he’s the only thing that counts in this country anymore.
I think they were intentionally removed, all in ways that impugned their character (spending too much money, having an affair, etc.) in order to make them less credible. I guess that’s better than being shot, though.
The people I think should watch their backs are Broadwell and her father. I think Obama has threatened Petraeus do much that even though Petraeus called his bluff with his resignation (but too late, alas), he probably will be like a lamb in his “testimony.” But Broadwell seems to be beyond his reach.
Watch for her to go to jail and possibly even be tried for treason for the “many classified documents” she had on her computer (she has a very high security clearance, btw). I think she’s going to be the scapegoat, because the generals, gentlemen that they are, are going to knuckle under to Obama.