Posted on 11/17/2012 11:40:15 AM PST by patriot08
You would think that a fact like this would draw the interest of your average red-blooded all-America journalist.
Of COURSE he cheated. But the sad part of the problem is,other than Allen West, and some Tea Party patriots, the Republicans are passing it off as a “ hispanic problem, lack of interest in Evangelical Christians, etc etc....
The election 2012 was STOLEN!!! Absolutely without a doubt.
Shame on our CONGRESS for not establishing a National VOTER ID law!
What's more disturbing is that in '08 McRino pimped him saying we didn't have to be afraid of an Obama presidency and didn't press for equal vetting, and in '12 Romney isn't pursuing BLATANT voter fraud. We haven't had a two party system for at least the middle of W's reign.
“You would think that a fact like this would draw the interest of your average red-blooded all-America journalist.”
Their cause is more important than their craft. The ends justify the means is the mantra of American journalists.
Of my sons group of friends - only one voted for Obama. That fellow? Shoplifts all the time and sees nothing wrong with it. We feel like that pretty much sums up Obama supporters - which includes the media.
Where does this fact come from?
According to Florida Division of Elections St. Lucie County only counted 123,750 votes, a turnout of 70 percent.
So that was the voter registration number on Oct 9th? If so, an election can't get more stinky than this.
- - - - - - - - - -
"Voter Registration Book Closing DatesBack
You can apply to register to vote at any time. However, to vote in an election, you must be registered in the state by the book closing date, which is normally the 29th day before each election. The book closing dates for the 2012 election cycle are:
| PPP Election............. | January 3, 2012 | |
| Primary Election........ | July 16, 2012 | |
| General Election........ | October 9, 2012 | " http://election.dos.state.fl.us/voting/voting-info.shtml |
Rats won’t want voter ID unless we out-cheat them.
I have updated my tag-line.
It is not possible for a democrat to win an election without cheating in One way or another.
Steyn or Hanson pointed out that in a few Philadelphia precincts, Obama got 100% to Romney’s 0% of the votes cast.
Gee whiz, professor—props to The Cipher!
The Wayback time machine tells us that he did even better than Josef Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Adolf Hitler or Korea’s Kims in their overwhelming electoral victories ...
And the birds sing his praises in human voices over at Demokrat Undersewer.
Why have I not heard ANYTHING from John fund on ANY of the talk shows on the TV, radio or Internet?
Why have I not heard ANYTHING from John fund on ANY of the talk shows on the TV, radio or Internet?
My understanding is that each voter gets 2 cards when they vote and the 141% claim is because they listed total voters and total cards. Someone ran without factoring in the 2 cards per voter. So if that is true then the actual 70% turnout makes sense.
“Where does this fact come from?”
It was a two page ballot, with a lot of local issues. 125,000 + 125,000= 250,000 (approx). It’s a bogus number. Every voter had two ballot cards.
You would think that “facts” like that would make intelligent readers think twice about believing what they are reading.
The statement is false. It is clearly false. You’d have to be stupid to think a politician who just ran for office would ignore such an obvious indication of fraud.
There were two ballots per voter, and some idiot took the count of “ballots” and thought it was a count of voters, and then wrote a blog entry, and other blogs picked it up, and it became “common knowledge”.
The internet allows a stupid person to get national prominence before sanity kicks in.
Why is this not contested by the GOP? It seems that until the electoral college votes on December 17 that we should be fight.
St. Lucie County (where Mr. Obama got 247,713 votes from only 175,554 registered voters)
[ Romney isn’t pursuing BLATANT voter fraud ]
He took a DIVE.. I told you so... <<— complicit...
I appreciate the collective wisdom of FreeRepublic to set the record straight.
The flop horse flopped just like the last article 2 ineligible candidate we ran.
It does make sense, and then counting like this makes for an easy set-up for fraud because...
dividing by 2 to get the ‘actual voter count’ is a set-up for fraud since this is really a percentages of pages or “cards casted.”
Say 300 voters of 850 registered voter precinct voted, but 100 of them under-voted by voting on one page of a two page multi-form ballot, the cards casted would be 100 for this group.
The rest of the 200 voters filled out both pages for a total of 400 "votes" or really cards annotated as votes.
So that’s is 200 x 2 = 400 cards cast, and 100 x 1 = 100 cards cast here is a total of 500 or 58.8% of the 850 total registered voter for that precinct.
When 500 divide (cards cast) by 2 which equals 250 voters, which as we see doesn’t add up to the 300 voters who actually voted in this example.
If all 300 voters voted on both pages it would be a 600 card count and the card cast % would be 70.58%.
So is it 250 votes or it 300 voters? This counting method used by St Lucie County can be used to manipulate the total votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.