Secondly, we don't know exactly what TV monitor that Apple will announce. But we do know they will firstly sell in the Apple Store alongside their other devices. So would Apple waste time on a high-resolution TV monitor? I certainly would hope so, in order to support the resolution of their devices. And does newegg.com sell HD TV monitors with retina resolution and internet capabilities for $500? I don't think so. That was the question which you avoid and give twisted responses, just like Obama. Having a resolution higher than normal HD TVs results in additional capabilities like banners, split-screens and other information without losing TV image quality that is also displayed. Will Apple incorporate such additional features? Unknown. But it is likely to become standard in the near future.
So drop your name-calling, as you are a moron to think the resolution that is standard now, won't be upped in the near future. Standards change continually. The only thing certain, is that the price will be high. You get what you pay for. If you don't want it, don't buy it, settle for less. I did that for some of my computers, like buying a Samsung HD TV monitor for $200 for a Mac Mini Server, even though the Mini resolution is higher than HD. It suited my needs. Other PCs have higher resolution monitors, for Photoshop and video-editing work that I do. Wait until the product comes out, evaluate your needs, then discuss it on what it won't do for you at a price you're willing to pay. And discuss it intelligently.
BTW, if you dislike ad hominems, what's with "That was the question which you avoid and give twisted responses, just like Obama"? Physician, heal thyself...