Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

If there are only “citizens” and “natural born citizens” then are you claiming that a “natural born citizen” cannot be a Senator?

The language of the Constitution says a Senator must be a “citizen”. If “citizen” is its own category, separate from “natural born citizen” - then the clear implication would be that a “natural born citizen” wouldn’t be eligible for the office.

Now that right there is funny.


316 posted on 11/29/2012 12:17:15 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
The language of the Constitution says a Senator must be a “citizen”. If “citizen” is its own category, separate from “natural born citizen” - then the clear implication would be that a “natural born citizen” wouldn’t be eligible for the office.

"Natural born citizen" is a subset of the group "citizen"; those "citizens" who are born in the country, to parents who are both "citizens" themselves.

317 posted on 11/29/2012 12:23:12 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
I may have been a bit hasty in my writing. I know you're having fun with my words, but I think you know my meaning.

Of course "citizen" is the broadest category that includes "natural born citizen." Anything that applies to citizens applies to natural born citizens, but the reverse is not true.

-PJ

319 posted on 11/29/2012 12:33:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson