Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

But the New York amendments are talking about people who were citizens before July 4th, 1776


323 posted on 11/29/2012 1:59:06 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan
And? My point is they were not natural born citizens of the United States as the poster I responded to said they were. Citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution is NOT a subset of “natural born citizen”.

George Washington, for example, was born a natural born subject of England. He was no longer a British subject but a citizen of Virginia when Independence was declared and Virginia was no longer legally a colony, but a sovereign State. He became a citizen of the United Stats when the States united under the Constitution. He was a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Was he a citizen before that? Yes, but not legally of the United States - because the United States only legally existed after the adoption of the Constitution.

Of citizens of the United States, the Constitution only envisions three types. Those who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, those that would be natural born citizens of the new republic, and those who would be naturalized under a uniform law for naturalization passed by Congress.

324 posted on 11/29/2012 3:24:34 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson