Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; Puzo1

>> “So you are reduced now to making the argument that the founders were more familiar with Vattel than they were with English law?” <<

.
They were familiar with both, but they studied almost exclusively in the French language during that period. Things expressed in the English language were considered crude and erudite.


92 posted on 11/20/2012 12:52:05 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
Well then, they didn't say natives or indigenous citizens - as the direct translation of Vattel would have it - they said “natural born” - the exact same phrase encoded into English law.

The system of law that the American founding fathers were most familiar with was English law - not the writings of Vattel - which never were codified into law in any nation.

94 posted on 11/20/2012 1:34:44 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

John Adams, a founding father and a lawyer by vocation, was sent to represent us in France - and was considered an unlikely choice because he did not at the time speak French.

He became fluent only after living in France. So it seem he, as just one example, did not study almost exclusively in French.


95 posted on 11/20/2012 1:38:56 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson