How do you suppose "they" planned the collision so that Patton would break his neck but all other parties would be uninjured? What kind of voodoo did they have to accomplish that? And wouldn't it have made a lot more sense to simply have someone shoot him? It was a war zone, after all. Lotsa people running around with guns, explosives, weapons of all sorts. Wouldn't have aroused much suspicion if a ranking general in the Allied forces had been gunned down.
I see this as a revisionist parlor game, nothing more.
posted on 11/22/2012 10:25:26 AM PST
Patton was doing OK under the treatment he was getting from the combat doctors in Germany. They had to take him back to the states and put him under the care of experts that could deliver a ‘successful’ result.
posted on 11/22/2012 10:34:47 AM PST
Talk about revisionist history, I watched Oliver Stone’s Showtime recreation of virtually every aspect of US History. The Communist agent and former VP Henry Wallace was re-patriated and deloused as a great progressive who was badly treated by FDR and Harry Truman. Watch the lies our children will learn as gospel truth
posted on 11/22/2012 3:40:28 PM PST
(Cogito, ergo armatum sum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson