No. If SHE had done the right thing, she'd never have broken into his house with a lead pipe in the first place.
She is the instigator, anything that happened to her after that is her own damn fault.
“...anything that happened to her after that is her own damn fault.”
Perhaps one can view it that way. Does it mean the old guy could have done “anything” and be innocent?
In other words, the immoral actions of one person justify the immoral actions of another person.
Two wrongs make a right.
I disagree with this analysis.
He chose to do evil in response to her evil act when he could have done good.
He could have defended his home and then called an ambulance.
He instead chose to commit murder.