Yabut, does the data match the model?
Ain’t “lookin’ good” for the greedy, freeloading enviroloonies. They may end up having to get REAL JOBS in order to have money to buy food.
"Proud man," said the Nguarorerue. "What are these data, if not direct revelation? Where have they come from, if not from the Rocket which is to be? How do you presume to compare a number you have only derived on paper with a number that is the Rocket's own? Avoid pride, and design to some compromise value."But that would not serve the left's agenda, so forget it.
Or maybe: The data is RACIST!
So when you take the net of Greenland and Antarctic ??? I'm guessing this is just a little shifting and jostling - admittedly on a global scale in Gigatons over centuries...
The undulations of the geoid have NOT changed..... so go to bed.
I think I can make a fairly accurate prediction that by 13,000 years we'll be in another deep Ice Age cycle, and we won't be worried about Greenland's ice melting, but rather the giant, 1 mile thick ice sheet that will cover North America--almost all of Canada and half the USA--and when is THAT going to melt? Oh, and don't forget similar concerns about the giant European and Siberian continental ice sheets!
At that time, our descendants will want to dig us up and kick our a$$es because we were stupid enough to believe in global warming and did nothing to stave off the ice. Of course, our graves will be covered with 6,000 feet of ice by then....
Facts have no implications whatsoever for that crowd.
Thanks.
It will be interesting to follow their repeated surveys over the years to see if there is a trend that can be correlated with the documented North Atlantic Ocean 30 year Oscillation.
And by “science” I assume that entails: application of the Scientific Method?
Because I can hardly think of an area where the word Science is used more incorrectly than in relation to the climate.
Well, this can’t be good news for the socialist “global warming” scammers.
How are they supposed to convince world populations that they need to pay much higher prices (in the form of much higher taxes) for energy with this kind of news being published in the New York Times and aired by the dinosaur network newscasts?
Wait. What?