Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: oh8eleven
And 99% of the time, big feet do = big women.

Are you a professional in some field that would make it possible this contention is anything other than made up off the top of your head?

Foot length correlates with height, so some extent, although not universally. My middle daughters (14 and 12) both have size 10-1/2 feet, and the younger's may not be done growing. The older one is about 5'7", which is tall-ish, but not impressively so. The younger is just over 5 feet. Neither girl is "large" in any meaningful sense.

Larger feet in the population as a whole appears to reflect better nutrition, as even taller people in earlier generations (or in cruddy countries) tended to have smaller feet. My feet are 9-1/2s, and I'm 5'4". One of my Mexican friends is 5'10" and has size 6-1/2 feet.

23 posted on 12/08/2012 12:53:03 PM PST by Tax-chick (More than you ever wanted to know, right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: All

Bad neighborhood. I grew up near their and it was bad then and worse now.

Not too smart of a businesswoman leaving 10k of merch in her car overnight.


24 posted on 12/08/2012 1:40:38 PM PST by Rodney Dangerfield ("Hate standing in line at the Post Office? - wait until ObamaCare is implemented.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
Larger feet in the population as a whole appears to reflect better nutrition
Are you a professional in some field that would make it possible this contention is anything other than made up off the top of your head?
26 posted on 12/08/2012 1:53:24 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson