Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Marie; GeronL

Yea, like that was the only incident, and as if it makes the act of a mohel orally sucking the mutilated penis of an infant all fine and dandy.


94 posted on 12/10/2012 9:53:31 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

You are speaking of an ancient practice that led to fewer infections for infants, men and the women that they later married.

Back when the practice of filling the mohel’s mouth with wine and covering the freshly circumcised penis with that wine was first done, humanity had no knowledge of bacteria. The mohel was giving the infant an antibiotic covering over the fresh wound. We didn’t know why it worked, but it did. If the mohel performed his duties well, the child wouldn’t become infected.

Anti-semites have perverted the practice. Made it sound like some sort of child molestation.

It’s not. It’s sanitation.

Now, in my mind, there is no reason for anyone but a Jew to do this. If others want to follow the example, fine. But our ways have proven sound for three thousand years and work for US. There are many more traditions that have have proven protection for our health in the long run, in addition to this one.


96 posted on 12/10/2012 10:02:39 PM PST by Marie ("The last time Democrats gloated this hard after a health care victory, they lost 60 House seats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson