Forced labor (save for genuine criminals, many of whom probably ought to receive capital punishment anyhow) is slave labor. Unforced labor is not. It really is not hard to define, unless all labor is somehow “forced” (which it isn’t).
I see you are defining “pure capitalism” in communists’ terms. Automatic false dilemma. There are other ways to subsist than being part of an enterprise or having to sell labor to those who can afford to buy it.
And besides, I was not speaking of the capital/labor aspects of communism when I first replied to this thread, but rather the (doctrinal) rejection of religion by communists.
>>>>>I see you are defining “pure capitalism” in communists’ terms. Automatic false dilemma. There are other ways to subsist than being part of an enterprise or having to sell labor to those who can afford to buy it.<<<<<<
I don’t see any problem using marxist terminology since it work so well to defeat their agenda.
>>>And besides, I was not speaking of the capital/labor aspects of communism when I first replied to this thread, but rather the (doctrinal) rejection of religion by communists.<<<
In fact you mentioned both “capitalism” and “labor”.
BTW, communism itself is absolutely not about a forced labor at all. A need in forced labor is simply an inevitable consequence of communist brainwashing. A society of liberal idiots whose values are political correctness, whose jobs are collecting benefits and whose skills are centered around videogames will need an iron fist one day.
As soon as makers population to shrink to zero there won’t be any place for takers as well. They will be put to at least some use by force in order to keep civilization.
That is the future if conservatives will fail to enforce their values.