Nope. Totally and completely wrong. I picked the first "non-Rossi" (i.e. without the word "E-Cat" somewhere in the title or origin) blog SPECIFICALLY because the owner of the blog is known as THINKING ROSSI IS A FRAUD, and it gave a link to the Iwamura work.
Also, among those who follow alternate energy work, "New Energy and Fuel" is considered a very reliable source. The "tone" of the article and the title of the article are totally his and had precisely zero to do with why I picked it.
If I had happened to hit a different blog, the title and tone of the article would probably be different.
But the choice was strictly happenstance.
So you see, your very first supposition is wrong.
And the rest of your blather is strictly from your own imagination and prejudices.
"even while mainstream science still shies away from LENR related work to a large degree, in fear of ruining their reputations."
True, unfortunately. A situation generated by a small group of pathological skeptics from the hot physics community to protect their funding sources.
"Are you going to call me clueless for saying THAT?"
Yup. I sure am. Go educate yourself on the actions of the physicists when CF was first getting started up, and continues even unto the present day. REALLY "dirty pool".
Krivit covers it quite nicely on his site, as did Eugene Mallove before his death. Pretty much every non-biased journalist has noted the same things.
"Does it induce a reaction within you to explain why that is so (but not exactly rightly so) while more anger stirs within yourself concerning my alleged cluelessness -- which you'd be more than happy to tell me about once again?
Anger??? No. A bit of sadness, perhaps.
It's no sin to be clueless (ignorant). What "is" a sin is to refuse to look at information to relieve the ignorance....that qualifies as stupidity.
Here's a quote for Leonardo da Vinci which applies:
"There are three classes of people.....those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see."
"Like I said, it's going to take a while to clear the taint here on FR because of that history HERE."
Oh, I suspect that the air will never be cleared. The "good manners" thread is already veering.
I suggest you leave the psychoanalysis to professionals.
I already did that. Long ago, and refreshed my memory recently. From Krivit. Before posting to you. Oblique reference to it was included in what I just said to you.
Don't believe you. Pull some one else's leg. You liked it. It was still flamebait regardless, for this forum and though Krivit otherwise a critic of Rossi, still mentioned him in a positive light? Inconsistent. That was part of the bait, whether you planned it or not.
I guess you can see that by now, so some progress has been made.