Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name

Oh come on. He doesn’t advocate the destruction, he’s really just talking about the same general idea that all the big sci-fi authors grappled with: that creating intelligent machines stronger, and possibly smarter than us, could lead to our own extinction.

Isaac Asimov came up with his “Robotic Laws” to deal with this kind of problem, postulating that intelligent machines would need to be “hard-coded” to never cause harm to humans, otherwise building them would be too risky.


15 posted on 12/27/2012 7:50:07 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

I’ve read a good deal about the possibility of this type “singularity” and it is a bit unnerving. Who’s to say that Asimov’s 3 laws will always be incorporated into leading edge robotics and computer technology. If the singularity is real there is always the chance that the 3 laws are ignored for the sake of getting to market first, etc. and thus, there is that danger. I doubt it will happen in my lifetime but we are hurtling headlong in that direction.


17 posted on 12/27/2012 8:58:54 PM PST by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
He doesn’t advocate the destruction

Avoiding his own words and instead reading his mind to make it fit and what others did?

19 posted on 12/27/2012 9:00:16 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

And how’d that work out? They made themselves Law Zero.


21 posted on 12/27/2012 9:41:52 PM PST by farlander (Fiat Justitia, Ruat Caelum. Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson