You wrote: “Is this a shot across obama’s bow? If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility. They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos? Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.”
For the record, I am a “Proud Birther” and have been since June 8, 2008 when the first forged “Certification of Live Birth” was presented by the Obama myrmidons.
I will be VERY surprised if the case goes to the full court for arguments. I pray it does.
Freepers, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the process here is that the Justices get a copy of the suit, read it and then “conference” and vote to bring it to the full Court for arguments. I have read previously that the “Rule of Four” for a “Writ of Certiorari” to bring it to the full Court is the requirement. That is, at least four Justices have to vote to hear the case in the full Court.
Two items to consider: 1. Justice Roberts has either been “bought” or is being blackmailed.
And, 2. The Supreme Court, I believe, will not go down the path of removing the first sitting black pResident.
The major cities would burn: Boston, New York City, Newark, Philly, Baltimore, DC, Atlanta, Miami, New Orleans, Detroit, Chicago, and LA, and on and on. Think about that. This is why I have always consider Obama to be THE current National Security Threat. We as a Nation are being held hostage by this Chicago Thug.
I, sadly, have been resigned to the fact that we have Obama for the duration.
They have dismissed other similar cases without conference.
Which chaos would the justices rather have?
One driven by rule of law that shows fraud on the part of a powerful and popular leader - coupled with inner city rioting.
Or
One driven by the federal branch acting outside its authority that has tens of thousands of armed citizens striking back at the illegal actions of a federal government, that is likely to fight back.
In my view, one chaos is contained and self-inflicted, likely to have limited duration and be controllable.
The other is very open ended.
It looks like the choice could very well be in the hands of the USSC. I know which way I would pick. (Assuming they are aware of the coming Obama EO on guns.)