One very serious flaw in that has now been exposed: The Hawaii state registrar has legally confirmed that Obama has no legally-established birth facts, and Hawaii law requires the birth facts claimed on Obama’s legally non-valid Hawaii BC to be legally determined in an administrative or judicial procedure.
IOW, the judicial system says this is best decided by the political process, but Hawaii statutes say it can ONLY be decided by a legal process presided over by a judge.
There is NO WAY that this even CAN be a “political question”, by the judicial definition of “political”.
Nothing personal, but maybe this concept really is beyond the average person's intellect. If Congress or a state wants pass a law that requires a candidate for POTUS to produce a valid birth certifcate as a condition precedent for getting on the ballot, then that's up to Congress or the States to establish such a policy. The SCOTUS decides questions of law; it does not decide policy/political questions.