Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

P 766 of 906 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf‘‘(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.—

‘‘(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.—A wellness
and health promotion activity implemented under subsection
(a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any
information relating to—
‘‘(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully-possessed
firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property
of an individual; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm
or ammunition by an individual.
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.—None of the
authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that
Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the
collection of any information relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm
or ammunition;
‘‘(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or
‘‘(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON DATABASES OR DATA BANKS.—None of
the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made
by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used
to maintain records of individual ownership or possession of
a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON DETERMINATION OF PREMIUM RATES OR
ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.—A premium rate may not
be increased, health insurance coverage may not be denied,
and a discount, rebate, or reward offered for participation in
a wellness program may not be reduced or withheld under
any health benefit plan issued pursuant to or in accordance
with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an
amendment made by that Act on the basis of, or on reliance
upon—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm
or ammunition; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use or storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(5) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR
INDIVIDUALS.—No individual shall be required to disclose any
information under any data collection activity authorized under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment
made by that Act relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm
or ammunition; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm
or ammunition.’’.
(f) Section 2718 of the Public Health Service Act, as added
by section 1001(5), is amended to read as follows:


7 posted on 01/16/2013 8:58:27 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Neidermeyer

“No individual shall be required to disclose any
information under any data collection activity authorized under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act relating to—”

It looks like the feds have the wording they need. Sure, you don’t HAVE to answer the question, but if you don’t, then you just did answer - as far as they’re concerned. You would have just said: “Yes, I have guns, and yes, I have an attitude”. That’s what they’re looking for.

Now, if it had been written to prevent doctors from asking any questions on the subject, then we would have been covered. Looks like the NRA fell for that ruse.


15 posted on 01/16/2013 9:07:20 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Neidermeyer

[[(a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any
information relating to—]]

Oh- they don’t require you to tell them- they sneak it on you when you least expect it and trick peopel into ‘voluntarily givign htem the answer’ liek htey did in my case unfortunately- They also ask right before that “Have you ever thoihgt about hurtuing yourself or anyone else?” And had I been more mentally alert, I mgith have said “Well, now that you mention it, Not until just now- Are you insured?”


19 posted on 01/16/2013 9:15:15 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Neidermeyer

Thanks for that detailed and very lengthy legal paragraph of the rules. I guess that is what The King’s Edict #2 is about:

2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.


42 posted on 01/16/2013 10:58:20 PM PST by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson