Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: virgil283

After they built it they realized the tail hook wasn’t any good for its weight. Whenever the tail hook was used it would tear up the belly fairing. Also, it was totally mechanical. Once it was down, you had to physically reinstall it.

Since the USAF doesn’t require a tail hook, except in an emergency, they went with the F-111. They Navy went with the F-14.


11 posted on 01/22/2013 7:55:10 AM PST by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: PJammers
ever know an F111 mech name of John Mushak(sp) while in Saudi?
12 posted on 01/22/2013 3:06:37 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: PJammers

I forgot to mention that the F-111 was an attempt to build a weapons platform for multi service use. The thought process was it would be cheaper if both the AF and Navy could use the same aircraft. It never works.


14 posted on 01/23/2013 6:34:20 AM PST by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson