self-defense and it doesn't get more basic than that.
Al "Meal-ticket" Sharpton or Bronco "Blowfly" 0'Bozo
It would upset "religious" ceremonies @ the NOW Gang Church.
Posted on 02/01/2013 5:07:47 PM PST by Morgana
February 1, 2013 (STOPP) - The stinging tears and palpable heartbreak of a young woman deceived by Planned Parenthood say more than a book crammed with words ever could convey about the harm done to women when they are deprived of a glimpse of the humanity of their children before aborting them.
“I just got back from Planned Parenthood,” a visibly distraught young lady says in a YouTube video posted on January 19. She had just picked up records from a Planned Parenthood abortion that happened six years earlier. She says Planned Parenthood falsified the records regarding her age at the time of the abortion.
Struggling to maintain her composure, she sifts through the abortion records until she finds the ultrasound report. It indicates that she was offered and took advantage of the opportunity to view the image of her son prior to the abortion. She flatly denies that.
“I never saw my ultrasound,” she says. “I was told nothing was visible, and I was told that it wouldn’t matter—you couldn’t see a heartbeat, you couldn’t see anything. . . . I wouldn’t know what I was looking at.”
She displays the ultrasound form, which says that she requested and was given a copy of the image. “I wasn’t ever given a picture of my son. But when I went to Planned Parenthood today and I got all of the records, I saw that ultrasound for the very first time—about six years later,” she says, choking back tears. She points to an image in which she says she can see her baby’s heart beating.
She appeals to Planned Parenthood and to the people who support it with a heartfelt cry:
I just want to know why I was denied seeing this. You say that women don’t change their minds because of it. I don’t know if I would have, but if I had, would it have been so bad? You talk about choice, and all this crap, but when we want to pass laws about women having to see their ultrasound before having an abortion, [you say] that’s wrong. So basically, what you are saying is you don’t want to give them full choice. You just want them to pick your choice.
“I can’t even explain how much I sobbed when I saw that.”
She tearfully continues,
And my world just fell apart all over again. This was my child. This wasn’t a choice or just a little something that I got rid of in a simple medical procedure. This was my son. And this is the first time I’ve ever seen him. And there is something so wrong about that.
Until we stop allowing Planned Parenthood to obfuscate and lie about the humanity of those lives it considers worth sacrificing for the money it makes, the world will continue to be deceived and Planned Parenthood will continue to flourish, becoming fatter and fatter on our tax dollars and on the blood of the precious innocent aborted babies who so often get omitted from the abortion debate.
The personhood of these children is real and undeniable. We must protect their lives from the moment of creation, and guarantee their rights as members of the human family from the beginning of their biological development. For more information on personhood, visit our website.
One out of how many?
This makes sense to me, though, because abortion never makes sense to me. Many of those girls who have no regrets were not told the truth, that is how they can rationalize the death.
I say jail time for the women who do this.
A slick lawyer will get a real prolifer on the jury and she'll walk out of the courthouse a free woman.
We are not, after all, dealing with a non-violent situation where nobody got hurt ~ they killed her baby ~ she has a fundamental right of self-defense and it doesn't get more basic than that.
I pray for the women who don’t realize they’ve been lied to, that are caught up with abortion, and not just the women and girls, but the men and boys who impregnated them. This country is under the farcical belief that you can have sex without repercussions. We need to reeducate our young people that sex has consequences beyond STDs. There is guilt and shame (at a minimum) to deal with when having an abortion. These are real lives that are snuffed out! Some, like the woman in the article, are beginning to see the reality of this. Unplanned pregnancies are difficult times, but not impossible. I will continue to pray for all involved. I hope we can reeducate our young people, but we need God’s help.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
So why did she decide to go back and pull her records, now?
“Mother’s world falls apart....”
.
Now imagine what the fetus’ world was like on that day.
I’m not sure but it appears she was not the only one to do so. I am gonna go out on a limb here and take a wild wild guess and say “Lila Rose” has something to do with this either directly or indirectly. I have a wild hunch something or rather someone tipped her off.
Because she changed
This is wasted thought. It won't happen while the death cult that is the Democratic Party remains the most popular party in the United States and the darling on the MSM.
How very nice for her....
Would you prefer she not change???
The above excerpt from the article suggests that at least 6 years have gone by AND that she was underage at the time.
Isn't underage something like 15 years old?
Sounds to me like someone took advantage of a scared minor. I'm glad she's changed.
I don't know "she's changed" is a safe bet.
After all, it seems she's still all about "me."
It said that PP had to falsify her age. Again that suggest to me that she was underage....15 or less.
Even now we’re talking about an early 20-something.
Yes, I want her to change, so if her talk about the baby is a sign of that or would lead her to do that, then I’m in favor of it.
It said that PP had to falsify her age. Again that suggest to me that she was underage....15 or less.
Even now we’re talking about an early 20-something.
Yes, I want her to change, so if her talk about the baby is a sign of that or would lead her to do that, then I’m in favor of it.
“Isn’t underage something like 15 years old? “
could be 16 or 17 years old. As long as she was under 18.
“I don’t know “she’s changed” is a safe bet. “
She sounds like someone rattled to the core. I am sure she had complete trust in these people and they broke it. If she sounds “about me” then on one level she is correct. That was her baby they killed. She even states “my son” in the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.