Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Whether on paid business travel or on vacation, my time is worth $50/hr. Only on short trips of <360 miles is a train not going to make my trip vastly more expensive.

Say someone is making $25/hr, an additional 6hrs on the train equals $150. And the last time I checked, AMTRAK was already more expensive than flying.

Also, driving inside of 250 miles is almost always faster than total trip time of flying, from home to final destination.

Finally, with relatively little additional cost, current trains could be running at 100mph over most lines, but they don’t because it would be more expensive.


24 posted on 02/06/2013 8:27:32 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

“And the last time I checked, AMTRAK was already more expensive than flying.”

Wow, it’s slower, more expensive, and more often than not hopelessly behind schedule*. What’s not to like?

*In Amtrak’s defense this is because it uses the trackage of private railroads, who have no compunctions about holding up an Amtrak train to let one of their freighters through.


54 posted on 02/06/2013 9:18:57 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson