Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2013 9:14:16 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
There is, however, an alternative. Orson Welles did an amazing version in 1948, which was really his sets, lights and shadow masterpiece. A very surreal and mythical look, even down to his crown. He only had enough money to shoot for 23 days, but it is unique in film. Oddly enough, this was his second take on Macbeth, as his first one, a theater production in 1936, transported the scene from 11th Century Scotland to Haiti, with an all-black cast, and much more emphasis on witchcraft and voodoo. Though never produced as a movie, it is remembered as the Voodoo Macbeth.
2 posted on 02/09/2013 10:19:07 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"You mean Macbeth?"

6 posted on 02/09/2013 2:24:48 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson