Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TARP: The bailout success story that wasn’t
MarketWatch ^ | 2/12/13 | David Weidner

Posted on 02/12/2013 11:19:48 AM PST by illiac

Remember the Troubled Asset Relief Program, better known as TARP? When we last heard from the Treasury Department, on Jan. 23, TARP was being wound down. It was, in the estimation of Timothy Geithner & Co., a success: 93% of the $418 billion disbursed had been collected including $70 billion last year. Read the latest Treasury Department progress report on TARP .

Best of MarketWatch The 5 most and least affordable U.S. cities for housing Here's the one other story that you can't afford to miss today /conga/story_of_the_day.html 249502 But hold the Champagne. It ain’t over till it’s over.

The idea that TARP is somehow a wash because a few banks repaid the bailouts with interest is misleading. The reality is that bailed-out firms essentially wrote off their losses on taxes. As of Dec. 30, TARP was still owed $67.3 billion, including $27 billion in realized losses — which is to say, that money is gone and is never coming back. See the inspector general’s Jan. 30 report on TARP .

Now, TARP is losing money as it tries to exit the programs.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bailout; business; tarp
Almost as bad as a green energy investment by the gov't....
1 posted on 02/12/2013 11:20:00 AM PST by illiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: illiac

Who knew?! Why am I not surprised?


2 posted on 02/12/2013 11:30:02 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

The money center banks get plenty of Gov’t and FED subsidies, which have allowed them to re-cap themselves and pay off their TARP loans.

For example, they can borrow at zero percent from the FED and buy US Treasuries for 2-3%. They have gauranteed profits by originating mortgage loans, taking fees from customers, and selling the loans risk-free to FHA. As far as market-risk is concerned, this implicit guarantee of “too big to fail” means they have the same risk as Gov’t sponsored entities.

It is crony-capitalism at its worst.


3 posted on 02/12/2013 11:48:42 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Some of us knew this all along.

If the Republicans had stuck to attacking TARP and other bailouts we would have the Presidency and possibly the Senate. If the Tea Party had stuck to that theme as well they would have a lot more people in office and sending them checks.

We told you so.


4 posted on 02/12/2013 11:49:42 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Now, TARP is losing money as it tries to exit the programs.

But, But Ben said the FED has never lost money on TARP. They are only allowed AAA investment grade paper.

5 posted on 02/12/2013 12:15:56 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

The bankers has taken over the checkbook. Only the Bankers can get a govt loan and not pay it back.


6 posted on 02/12/2013 12:20:57 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson