Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1 in 7 WinXP-using biz bods DON'T KNOW Microsoft is pulling the plug
The Register ^ | 11th March 2013 14:34 GMT | Gavin Clarke

Posted on 03/12/2013 2:55:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: OldArmy52

I find 7 to be pretty solid. My home computer had a lot of issues with Flash, then I uninstalled all things Adobe and it hasn’t crashed again, I rely on Chrome’s internal Flash for stuff. I actually find 7’s explorer to be superior, I really like the navigation bar, I don’t do much finding. 8 has some good stuff, but it’s a different way of thinking that I’m not 100% sold on, interesting ideas. It’s clearly oriented to the non-power user that generally only runs half a dozen apps, give them all a tile and don’t worry about anything else.


41 posted on 03/12/2013 3:47:14 PM PDT by discostu (Not just another moon faced assassin of joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Drag Windows Explorer to the TaskBar and pin it. It works great as a stable file manager. I’m using it that way on 5 Win-7 Pro machines.

To get the File Menu back, download Ubit (English) and click on the idiot ribbon Menu, and you have the File Menu back.

http://www.ubitmenu.com/

Worth a try...


42 posted on 03/12/2013 3:48:01 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (AR-10s & AR-15s Are The 21st Century's Muskets. Free Men Need Not Ask Permission!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Disagree on both accounts. MS libraries makes searching your hard drive so vastly superior to XP to be laughable and makes XP archaic in comparison. Ribbon is much easier once you spend sufficient time on it.


43 posted on 03/12/2013 3:50:51 PM PDT by aft_lizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I did that for my Win7 desktop, but the Win7 Windows Explorer could only find Win7 versions of Explorer.exe, not the WinXP version of Explorer.exe. Sigh!


44 posted on 03/12/2013 3:53:15 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right; Sacajaweau; newfreep

This is a very interesting issue because, I agree with newfreep philosophically, but in the real world Leaning Right’s comments are worthy of consideration.

And I would say more there could be a national security issue as well.


45 posted on 03/12/2013 3:54:27 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They don’t know because they don’t want to know.

I find customers still using win 98, Win NT and Win 2000. They haven’t upgraded because they don’t want to spend the money.


46 posted on 03/12/2013 3:57:43 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

Microsoft support is good if you pay for it.


47 posted on 03/12/2013 3:59:05 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

Why do I view the Win8 Windows Explorer.exe to be inferior to the WinXP Windows Explorer?

Simple.

Because at work, we recently changed from WinXP Pro to Win7 Pro. When my desktop was XP, the XP Explorer.exe could find target data (we have huge amounts of data) readily for client requests. Now with Win7’s Explorer.exe, I no longer am able to reliably search and find target data. I know I have it on our server drives but rarely have successful search results any more.

But then what do I know? I’m just a professional programmer who has to deal with very large amounts of data. Unlike a casual home user.


48 posted on 03/12/2013 4:01:20 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

Yeah imagine having to learn something new every 5 or 6 years. How terrible.


49 posted on 03/12/2013 4:01:42 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
Drag Windows Explorer to the TaskBar and pin it

What I hate with Win7 File Explorer is that I try to look at a file, so I find the directory in the file tree window. Zap, it jumps back to the top of the tree. I click on the desired directory again. And it jumps again.

That is bad enough, but it really creates problems when I try to copy files from one directory to another. I highlight the file and point to what I think is the correct new directory in the tree window, and it jumps before the copying starts. Then, I have to search the drive to find out where it actually copied the file. Many times, the copied file ends up somewhere other than were it should have been copied to.

XP File Explorer never had that kind of problem.
50 posted on 03/12/2013 4:01:44 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I've said on FR in the past that there's a business opportunity there for enterprising sorts with the skills and background. I've got news for Microsoft, a fair number CAN'T upgrade beyond XP because of industrial software that will not function in 64 bit. They're going to stay right where they are and they will find somebody to keep them up and running. If Microsoft ceases to support the OS then there will arise a third party solution that does.
51 posted on 03/12/2013 4:02:48 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

Have been using Firefox since it’s inception. Both Linux and Windows versions.

I built my first computer in 1982. Ran TRSDOS, NewDOS80, all MSDOS and Windows. I never owned a version of ME or Vista, both real dogs. Worked on a number of them and hated it.

My first Linux install was a UMSDOS version of Slackware in around 1995. Used Redhat, Mandrake, FreeBSD and Ubuntu.

Even if I moved my wife to Linux, I would still have the re-education when major changes took place in a release. Some are automatic, but others are not.


52 posted on 03/12/2013 4:03:05 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

That is annoying. That’s why I right-click on the directory in question and “Open in New Window.” That keeps my blood pressure lower.


53 posted on 03/12/2013 4:03:30 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

Actually the interface is designed for the user to transition between devices and for constant internet connectivity. Its designed for people with ADHD in other words.


54 posted on 03/12/2013 4:04:11 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I still run XP (on a 2 year old PC) and I have never had a problem running anything on it.


55 posted on 03/12/2013 4:04:47 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

Windows 8 and windows 7 are functionally very similar. They added the new front end that works across pc platforms and mobile devices and touch screen functions . I don’t have any machines running 8 but I have read that there are ways to bypass the metro start up screen and third party software to replace it.


56 posted on 03/12/2013 4:05:13 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Normal isn't normal anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Perhaps, but that's fortunately not the case for any other software I've purchased (to the best of my memory).

So I'll opt, as in years past, to pass.

57 posted on 03/12/2013 4:06:28 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

A lot of issues you probably won’t even detect in this modern age of self updating apps. You can’t run the newest version of IE on XP (not such a bad thing, nothing makes a version of IE look better than the next version), but Windows won’t try. Don’t know if current Firefox supports XP, but again it’s self updating so if it doesn’t it wouldn’t try. I know we’re dropping XP from the stuff I work on, finally. You’ll probably start running into more things dropping XP now, .Net4.5 doesn’t support anything before Vista, so anybody that’s jumping to that has to drop XP.


58 posted on 03/12/2013 4:11:37 PM PDT by discostu (Not just another moon faced assassin of joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

Did you use the search at the top to locate the XP version?


59 posted on 03/12/2013 4:13:34 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (AR-10s & AR-15s Are The 21st Century's Muskets. Free Men Need Not Ask Permission!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Some newer games will not run on XP.

I was using XP64 for some time, however there is much more that will refuse to run there.

I have an 2 xp systems for most things and a win7 box for the new games and not much else.

60 posted on 03/12/2013 4:16:41 PM PDT by KEVLAR (Liberty or Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson