Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2013 3:27:18 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana

Feinstein and her ilk would load the guns.


2 posted on 03/19/2013 3:30:20 PM PDT by laplata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

She has never made any effort to limit gun use by criminals.


3 posted on 03/19/2013 3:31:28 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I predict the exact same Freepers will hate the GOP Candidate for: 2016,2020,2024,2028, 2032.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I’m reminded of a political cartoon I saw back in 1989 where it depicted Patrick Purdy (the 1989 Cleveland School massacre in Stockton, Cali) shooting a pregnant woman with an AK-47. The caption read something like, “I’m just helping this woman exercising her right to choice,” IIRC.


4 posted on 03/19/2013 3:35:17 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Feinstein, you are an ignorant sl...er...liberal.

I hope to give you the much practiced a finger salute in person someday.

And, by the way, I could hold your position, but you are far too stupid and uneducated to hold mine.

Shove it up your smelly Obama, wench.


5 posted on 03/19/2013 3:52:53 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Morgana, just wanted to say that while we may disagree on ecclesiology, etc., we are strong allies on the life issue. My wife too. In fact I mentioned a debate I was having with a progun proabort (I’ll explain in a moment), and she piped up wither the exact question posed in your headline. GMTA, eh?

Anyway, this debate I was in was ínteresting, because it gives a bit of a window into how some folks think about life and the Constitution. I was berated for wanting to “impose” my morality on women, and counted anticonstitutional because I would dare to seek the overturning of bad law like Roe. They had a terrible time recognizing that the right to live is the only logical basis for a right to use weapons, to defend either oneself or one’s family or country. It was a learning experience for me. I had uncritically been assuming most in the progun ranks would tend to be prolife. Perhaps a hasty assumption.


6 posted on 03/19/2013 5:43:55 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
Mrs. Feinstein...I’m not a sixth grader. Senator, I’ve been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years.

Meaning? Absolutely nothing. A resume of any significance does not rely solely on longevity in a position.

I walked in, I saw people shot. I’ve looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons. I’ve seen the bullets that implode [sic; and so completely clueless ].

Meaning? One suspects in the strongest terms that Mrs. Feinstein has real, actual, bona fide PTSD; and as such, has no business writing (or voting on) legislation on anything, much less firearms.

Look, there are other weapons. I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it.

Note the disconnect between the two thoughts? Apparently, the connection of the sentences made perfect sense to Mrs. Feinstein, and it is scary that such an addled human holds a seat the Senate of the United States, and votes.

.

7 posted on 03/19/2013 6:17:49 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson