Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog
The Lancaster was lightly armed and had no match for the American bombsight. That's why it was used for night carpet bombings instead of precision daylight bombings as the B17 was.

The Brits did develop a tachimetric bombsight late in the war but the heavy lifting was always done by the Mighty Eighth. Simply superior equipment. Pretty, who the F knows or cares.

45 posted on 03/19/2013 8:05:35 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard

The B-17 was in fact better armed as was the B-24.

The big advantage the Lancaster had was it’s incredible for the time bomb load. It could carry 22,000 pounds. It also had a much longer range than the B-17.

I will admit that an American aircraft carrying 13 .50 caliber guns was way ahead of 10 .303 machine guns.

I know that Lancasters were still being used only a few years ago, tho not as bombers.


52 posted on 03/19/2013 8:24:10 PM PDT by yarddog (Truth, Justice, and what was once the American Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson