The goal is not actual environmental change.
It’s economic warfare based on bad science.
In other words, You pump for pressure and fire for steam temps. Yes, it is more efficient. I would take exception with the saves water statement. even the older tech. recylces the existing water from condenser to feedwater to boiler to turbine and back to condenser. USC water passes through one time but i'm sure not discarded because it must be treated to remove disolved solids that would destroy turbine blading at these pressures. very expensive to treat that much water to those levels of cleanliness, no reason to discard the water under either format. There are many super-critical plants out there
I'll throuh the BS flag on that i'm afraid. Coal-fired UnitsI'm familiar with ran at much higher pressures than the nuke up river could. 2420 Throttle pressure and 1005 degree steam spinning generator at 3600 rpm for 60cycle power. nuke was 1000 throttle pressure and 850 steam temp spinning gen at 1800 rpm for 60 cyles, nuke gen had 4 poles while coal-fired had 2poles When the nuke guys came to visit they were always amazed at the raw power of the facilitymuch greater than they were used to. Clean coal tech works very well. amazing things can be done. May Man-Bear-Pig rot in hell for what hes brought the people. All about self enrichment and not a lick about actual science.
The Green movement is about weakening America, not about protecting the environment.