Replies

-Interesting discussion regarding this paper over on Vortex-L

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg78659.html

Re: [Vo]:how gamma radiation is thermalized

Axil Axil Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:05:48 -0700

The horse will never drink muddy water… You know...The pot calling the
kettle black. How can a true believer i the Hydrino theory of the world
make such a judgment? As for “and muddy thinking will not suffice in
science.” A quote from Peter
Hagelsteinabout
the danger of closed minds in science:
“It's(LENR) not going to happen anytime soon, most likely. For example the
physicist who was one of the organisers of the May 1st Baltimore session in
1989 that debunked cold fusion was a fellow by the name of Steve Koonin.
[He] was recently appointed to be under-secretary in charge of research at
the Department of Energy. As a result, basically part of his success and
part of his reputation was made based on killing cold fusion. He's now in a
position of responsibility for research at the DoE, you can imagine what
kind of difficulties that leads to in terms of trying to move cold fusion
research to the point where you get funding, or you try to remove the taint
from it. The folks that debunked cold fusion in 1989, many of them have
profited by their actions, and we will likely continue to pay for that for
years to come.” You know again...The pot calling the kettle black. "The
explanation offered violates conservation of momentum and is obviously
false." Conservation laws are not always conserved on the subatomic scale.
"The paper cited does not mention gammas, requires cryogenic temperatures
near absolute zero, and in point of fact - the effect would be complexly
destroyed by gamma radiation and has no applicability to gamma
shielding." requires
cryogenic temperatures near absolute zero? The reference does not say
this, I know I read the article. The article says
This makes exciton polaritons very attractive in the sense that they are a
high temperature quantum fluid.

300K is the high temperature sited

see

http://www.lpn.cnrs.fr/en/GOSS/CFMC.php

other references say the temperature can range as high as 2600K

I will connect the dots in painful detail because the process is a complex
one for those who require a cool drink. But you deserve the effort needed
to get you to the sparkling purity of that satisfying drink of water.

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Jones Beene wrote:

> The horse will never drink muddy water, and muddy thinking will not
> suffice in science.****
>
> ** **
>
> The explanation offered violates conservation of momentum and is obviously
> false.****
>
> ** **
>
> The paper cited does not mention gammas, requires cryogenic temperatures
> near absolute zero, and in point of fact - the effect would be complexly
> destroyed by gamma radiation and has no applicability to gamma shielding.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> End of story.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Axil Axil ****
>
> For all those who are interested in how gamma radiation is thermalized in
> hundreds of millions of microvolt thermal quanta, here is a quantum
> mechanical paper which contains a lot of words describing how the
> conditions for thermalization occurs out of the blue.****
>
> This finding is consistent with the long sought after physical
> manifestation of the model called the 'Spin-Boson Model' required to
> thermalize gammas.****
>
> My good fellows, when the answer is handed to you on a plate, look into it!
> ****
>
> But unfortunately we all know “You can take a horse to water but you can’t
> make him drink.”****
>
> Coherent Oscillations in an Exciton-Polariton Josephson Junction ****
>
> arxiv.org/pdf/1004.2216****
>
>
> Cheers: Axil****
>