I don’t think so. The site may have been used to bury the wealthy, but I cannot see what’s in it for the workers to drag multi-ton blocks over miles of terrain to put them up.
I think the bodies and the stones are not related, imo.
Or, the high priests (or major shamen) and their immediate families were the only ones buried there ~ then the religious affiliation that owned the temple area changed hands and they simply no longer buried anybody there.
It’s Bush’s fault!
{All them little bitty holes inside the big circle were for planting shrubbery .... Not bodies.}
Or are... in this way.
The area is supposedly at the intersection of ley lines, and is supposedly high in some 'ethereal' energy. I can see why they would make it a graveyard, then later when there were more people and tools, they dedicated the site with this stonework.
What I find odd is that 'ancient' mankind built bigger and better monuments that 'modern' man has, or is even capable of building.
Somehow this seems backwards.