[0.E.O]

Wrong. Evolutionism, an opposing faith, attempts to pervert science to confute creationism's agreement with scientific fact.

Scientifc fact or Biblical accounts?

[imardmd1]

Both. What I meant here is that creationism's validity is based both on a literal Biblical hermeneutic and factual science observations. I did not mean that it was possible for evolutionism to disprove creationism with scientific fact.

However, theistic evolution is a Scripturally indefensible oxymoron.