[dartuser]

Science constantly challenges its hypothesis ...

I would argue that once consensus is achieved in any theory, the proponents cannot assimilate new empirical data that contradicts the theory.

Then it is no longer scientific progress, but rather, the propagation of a myth.

[raygunfan]

well, im sure all the intellectual elitest on this board, i.e evolutionist have downloaded the pdf, gone thru it and throughly rejected it and also contacted the author himself and gave him what for..

or perhaps, as always, it will be the usual freeper elitest who simply post on the thread itself and trash it there so they dont have to actually challenge the science behind the scientist who wrote the book...

hmmmmm, guess which of the two scenarios is most likely....

[0.E.O]

I would argue that once consensus is achieved in any theory, the proponents cannot assimilate new empirical data that contradicts the theory.

Which does not stop people from trying. Evolution theories are constantly being examined and reviewed and, if the evidence supports it, updated.

Then it is no longer scientific progress, but rather, the propagation of a myth.

And how much challenge is there in the creationism world?

[Moonman62]

I would argue that once consensus is achieved in any theory, the proponents cannot assimilate new empirical data that contradicts the theory.

Did you know that a feather and lead ball will fall at the same rate in a vacuum?